AI construction document review & QA/QC
Find conflicts and missing information across construction drawings, specifications, checklists, and code references. Groundbook links each finding to the exact source so your team can verify it before construction.
Upload project PDFs
Choose files or drop them here
First project free
Inside Groundbook
From project PDFs to findings you can verify. Set up your first project free in about 5 minutes.
Add drawings and supporting PDFs. Choose which files to check and which to use as references.
Reviews typically take 20 minutes to 24 hours, depending on project size.
Bring project PDFs from the tools you already use.
From a real project review
Examples of findings from a waterfront hotel and restaurant project.
Hotel entry doors were listed as unrated where the surrounding separation called for protected openings.
The team needed to reconcile the door rating before procurement.
Structural details referred to architectural notes that specified a guard and handrail load below the adopted requirement.
The design criteria needed verification before detailing or fabrication.
A grease exhaust fan was shown on a wood platform without a documented clearance or noncombustible support condition.
The team needed to verify the support assembly and clearance.
Groundbook AI looks beyond a single sheet. It follows the relationships between disciplines and project requirements where costly issues often hide.
Compare architectural, structural, MEP, fire-protection, and civil documents for conflicts and missing coordination.
Examples: MEP ↔ STRUCTURE · ARCH ↔ MEPFind materials, ratings, dimensions, equipment, and requirements that disagree between the drawings and project manual.
Examples: RATINGS · MATERIALS · EQUIPMENTRun your own QA/QC, owner, lender, permit, or constructability checklist across the full document set.
Examples: QA/QC · OWNER STANDARDS · PERMITCompare project documents with uploaded code sources and surface items that need a qualified reviewer’s attention.
Examples: EGRESS · ACCESSIBILITY · FIRE SAFETYCoordinate design, preconstruction, and QA/QC across the people responsible for the set.
Check coordination across plans, schedules, details, and specifications before issuing the set.
Explore design-team reviews →Surface conflicting requirements, scope gaps between trades, and missing information during preconstruction.
Explore contractor reviews →Review project requirements and share findings with the teams responsible for resolution.
Explore owner reviews →Explore reviews for residential, commercial, healthcare, and infrastructure projects. Groundbook supports multilingual documents and teams worldwide.
An AI plan checker performs construction document review to surface possible conflicts, omissions, and compliance issues. Groundbook AI cross-checks drawings, specifications, checklists, and code documents and shows the source behind each finding.
Groundbook AI reviews construction drawings, project specifications, reviewer or owner checklists, and building-code PDFs. These can include architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire-protection, civil, and other project documents.
Yes. Groundbook AI is designed for every building type, from homes and ADUs to healthcare, education, commercial, industrial, infrastructure, and institutional projects.
Groundbook AI supports most countries and languages. The review logic is universal, so drawings, schedules, specifications, and reference documents are cross-checked the same way in any language, including English, Spanish, Portuguese, French, German, Italian, Dutch, Polish, Turkish, Russian, Arabic, Hebrew, Hindi, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Thai, and Indonesian, as well as less common languages such as Estonian, Icelandic, Georgian, Khmer, Amharic, and so on. The list is not exhaustive: if a language is not named here, chat with us and ask, or simply upload a set for free and test it. Mixed-language sets, local drawing conventions, and metric or imperial units are handled in the same review. For local requirements, upload the code or standard that governs your project and Groundbook compares the set against it.
Yes. Groundbook detects the codes your drawings cite and already has many in its library. For a local code or amendment it does not have, upload the code PDF or add a link to the public code page. Save an uploaded code PDF once and reuse it on every future project. Uploaded codes stay private to your account and are never shared with other customers. See how local code checks work.
Groundbook organizes the project set, follows references across documents, and returns structured findings with severity, impact, recommended action, and source locations. Your team can review the evidence behind each issue in one workflow. See the full comparison.
Project setup takes about 5 minutes without a sales call. Upload the project files, select the checks, review the exact price, and pay as you go. Reviews typically take 20 minutes to 24 hours, depending on project size.
No. Groundbook AI supports qualified project teams by accelerating the first review pass and organizing possible issues. Final design, engineering, code, and construction decisions remain with the responsible professionals and authorities.
You or the original rights holders retain ownership of your documents and project data. Uploading files does not transfer intellectual property rights to us. We do not use your project data to train models, sell it to third parties, or make it available to other customers. Service providers may process it only on our behalf and may not use it for model training. Authorized personnel may review it for support, quality assurance, debugging, and internal evaluation. Read our data ownership and privacy commitments.
