Firm QA/QC standards
Apply your internal drawing standards: required sheets, title-block information, general-note content, tagging conventions, and required schedules.
Checklist conformance review
Bring the checklist your firm, owner, lender, or jurisdiction already uses. Groundbook applies each item to the drawings, specifications, and references, then shows where the set answers it, where it does not, and where the answer is unclear.
Where to focus
Apply your internal drawing standards: required sheets, title-block information, general-note content, tagging conventions, and required schedules.
Check the set against owner design standards, program requirements, and lender or insurer conditions that the documents must show.
Use the jurisdiction’s plan-check checklist or submittal requirements to find items the package does not yet address before submission.
Confirm that the sheets, details, and specification sections expected at a given milestone are present and coordinated with the drawing index.
Inside Groundbook
Start with a review preset, then paste your checklist items into the review instructions. Note the items to focus on, any that do not apply, and the references needed to answer them. A longer checklist can be uploaded as a PDF and marked as a reference.
A practical workflow
Use the items in the form your team already reviews against. Paste them into the review instructions, or upload the checklist as a PDF and set it to “Use as reference”. Note items that do not apply and add any references, such as owner standards, that the items depend on.
A finding that depends on a checklist item quotes the item and links the sheet, schedule, or specification it checked. Decide whether the item is satisfied, unsatisfied, or needs more information.
Assign open items to the responsible designer, record the decision, and confirm the correction in the revised issue.
From a published project review
A completeness item of the kind a permit or QA/QC checklist asks: the deferred-submittal list did not match the systems the notes and approval conditions required.
Notes and approval conditions required sprinkler, alarm, and waterfront standpipe systems, but the deferred-submittal list identified only a different system.
Read the findingGroundbook applies the checklist your team supplies; it does not decide which checklist a project needs. Items that depend on calculations, site conditions, or professional judgment remain with the responsible reviewers.
Download a starter QA/QC checklist (CSV)Questions, answered
Any list your team reviews against: firm QA/QC standards, owner or lender requirements, a jurisdiction’s plan-check checklist, or a milestone deliverables list. Start with the review preset and add your items.
No. Paste the items as written into the review instructions, or upload the checklist as a PDF reference. Add a short note where a term is project-specific or an item does not apply.
No. A checklist review checks the set against your own list of items. A building-code review compares the documents with the code references you include. Many teams run both in the same project.
Keep exploring
Use a practical checklist with ownership and closure fields.
ExploreReview your permit set for missing information, conflicting requirements, and coordination gaps before submission. Explore a practical pre-permit checklist.
ExploreReview drawings against project code references with Groundbook AI. Trace potential code issues to the plan, schedule, and requirements behind each finding.
ExploreSet up a review or talk through your project with our team.