Keep requirements visible
Check owner criteria, program needs, design documents, schedules, and specifications for possible gaps or contradictions.
Protect the pro forma from problems hidden in the plans
Add an evidence-backed review across design documents, specifications, owner requirements, and code sources. Groundbook AI helps development teams surface risks while there is still time to protect scope, budget, and schedule.
Review any project size, type, or design milestone.
Groundbook AI for real estate developers is an AI plan review that checks a project's drawings and specifications against the program, owner requirements, and building codes, surfacing possible design coordination and requirement gaps with the exact sheet and location. It gives development teams an independent first pass before design decisions harden into cost.
Protect project intentCompare design documents with owner, program, lender, and project requirements.
See risks in contextReview coordination and consistency findings with direct links to their sources.
Check every milestoneRun targeted reviews at concept, permit, bid, construction-document, or turnover stages.
See more of the risk carried inside the document set
Groundbook AI gives development teams a repeatable review across the documents that define scope and quality.
Find cost questions earlier
Surface design and specification mismatches that may affect materials, equipment, allowances, procurement, or change exposure.
Reduce downstream disruption
Identify coordination and constructability questions before they threaten permit, buyout, fabrication, or field progress.
Project-wide coverage without waiting for a late-stage surprise
Use a standard owner checklist across the portfolio or tailor the review to a project’s priorities and stage.
Owner and program requirements
Run development criteria, brand standards, lender requirements, program checklists, or project goals across the design set.
Design coordination
Compare architectural, structural, MEP, fire-protection, civil, landscape, and interiors documents for possible conflicts.
Drawings against specifications
Find materials, products, ratings, dimensions, equipment, and performance requirements that may not align.
Building code review
Compare project documents with the building codes that apply and flag items that need a qualified reviewer’s attention. We read the codes and amendments governments publish online, and use licensed codes only where a license allows it.
Add review coverage without another consultant kickoff
Upload a milestone package
Add the design set, specifications, development criteria, checklists, and relevant reference documents.
Select project priorities
Choose design coordination, requirement, specification, checklist, constructability, or code-source checks.
Review with the delivery team
Share source-linked findings with the architect, engineers, contractor, and owner representatives for verification.
Bring the evidence to the people responsible for the answer
Groundbook AI organizes possible issues so development teams can focus conversations. It does not replace the architect, engineer, contractor, code official, or owner representative.
- Source-linked findings for focused team review
- Portfolio-ready checklists and project-specific checks
- Pay-as-you-go and enterprise volume options
See the project from every seat
Understand the delivery decision behind the schedule
What development teams ask
At which project stages can developers use Groundbook AI?
Groundbook AI can review any uploaded document set. Teams can use it at design milestones, before permit or bid, during preconstruction, or when a focused project question needs broader document context.
Can we use the same owner checklist across multiple projects?
Yes. A repeatable owner, brand, program, lender, or delivery checklist can be uploaded and applied to each project’s documents.
Does Groundbook AI replace design or construction professionals?
No. It provides possible issues and source evidence for qualified review. Final design, engineering, construction, code, and ownership decisions stay with the responsible people.
Make document risk visible before it becomes project cost
Set up a review yourself, or book time to talk through your project.