Conversions without surprises
New sort equipment, vans, and chargers are checked against the existing structure, slab, and services before an old warehouse becomes a station.
Enterprise plan review for parcel and delivery stations
For Fortune 500 parcel carriers, retailers, and enterprise delivery networks opening stations on fixed timelines. Catch conveyors on a slab that cannot carry them, more vans than the service can charge, and conversions that outgrow their sprinklers before a launch date is at risk.
Why teams use Groundbook
New sort equipment, vans, and chargers are checked against the existing structure, slab, and services before an old warehouse becomes a station.
Charger counts are checked against panel schedules, the one-line diagram, and the utility service, so the lot can charge every van it parks.
Each station is checked against your station standard, whoever adapts it to the building.
AI plan review for parcel and delivery stations is a first-pass check of a station's architectural, conveyor, site, electrical, and fire protection documents against each other, the specifications, your station standard, and the building code. Groundbook flags possible conflicts and missing information with links to the exact sheets, so the network's real estate and construction teams can settle them before the station goes to permit.
How it gets there
Each row is a place where the documents for one site often disagree. The review compares them and returns each possible conflict with the sheets it came from.
| Area | What is compared | A question a finding raises |
|---|---|---|
| Sort floor and conveyors | Conveyor and sortation layouts against column grids, slab details, and the existing structure | Do the conveyor supports on the equipment drawings land on the slab thickness and columns shown on the structural sheets? |
| Van loading and staging | Loading lanes, doors, and canopies against the floor plan, door schedule, and site plan | Does the number of van loading doors on the floor plan match the loading lanes striped on the site plan? |
| EV charging and service capacity | Charger layouts against site electrical plans, panel schedules, the one-line diagram, and the utility service | Does the service size on the one-line diagram cover the full count of van chargers shown on the site plan? |
| Site circulation | Truck, van, and employee traffic paths against grading, striping, and turning paths on the civil sheets | Do the tractor-trailer and van routes on the site plan cross where the civil sheets show no signage or striping? |
| Existing building conversion | Existing-conditions drawings, demolition plans, and new work against the code for the new use | Does the new use add storage or occupant load that the existing sprinkler system and exits were not designed for? |
| Fire protection under equipment | Sprinkler coverage under conveyors and mezzanines against the equipment layout and fire protection drawings | Do the fire protection drawings add sprinklers under the wide conveyor runs shown on the equipment plan? |
Distribution center project review · Renovation project review
In the program
Upload the station standard, equipment layouts, and site criteria. Every station set is checked against them.
Run a review on each station before permit, with existing-conditions drawings as references for conversions. Findings arrive in 20 minutes to 24 hours.
Lay the new floor plan over the existing-conditions plan with Smart Overlay to see where new work meets old structure.
Assign findings, export a report or Bluebeam markups, or send open items to Fieldwire as tasks for the contractor.
Enterprise
The review is the same on every plan. Enterprise changes how you buy it, sign in, connect it, and get help.
Volume pricing for programs reviewing 500 or more projects a year, or prepaid credits for up to 15% off. Every review shows its price before you pay.
SSO and MFA, an audit trail, granular access levels, and on-prem or US hosting. Encrypted, never used to train models, and an NDA on request.
Import from Autodesk Construction Cloud (including Revit sheets), SharePoint, Egnyte, ProjectWise, Box, and more, and send findings into your own systems with the REST API, CLI, or a custom integration.
A direct line to our team for onboarding, your review checklists and standards, code sources, and questions about findings.
See everything included in Enterprise · Security · Integrations
Other enterprise programs
Questions, answered
Yes. Upload the existing-conditions drawings as references with the new design set. The review compares new conveyors, chargers, and layouts with the existing structure and services and flags where they disagree.
Yes. Upload your station standard or design criteria as a reference file with each set. The review flags where the station drawings depart from it, and each finding links to the sheet and the standard.
Programs reviewing 500 or more projects a year get volume pricing. Smaller programs can buy prepaid credits for up to 15% off. Every review shows its exact price before you pay, and the first project is free.
No. Groundbook surfaces possible issues with links to their sources. The architects and engineers of record, your own team, and the authority having jurisdiction remain responsible for every decision.
On AWS in the United States by default, or on-prem for programs that need it, encrypted at rest and in transit. Project data is never used to train models and is visible only to the people you invite. SSO and MFA, an NDA, and security questionnaires are available on request.
Tell us how many sites you build or remodel a year and which systems you use. Or try a set yourself: the first project is free.
Check your next delivery station before permit
Trusted by hundreds of professionals