Review the full set before redlines become RFIs

Cross-check drawings, specifications, consultant sets, checklists, and building codes in one review. Groundbook AI helps your team find coordination gaps while they are still design problems—not field problems.

Set up in about five minutes. No sales call required.

Groundbook AI for architects is an AI plan review that cross-checks the architectural set against consultant drawings, specifications, schedules, checklists, and building codes in one pass. It flags possible coordination gaps, inconsistencies, and compliance questions with the exact sheet and location, so the architect of record can resolve them before they become RFIs or rework. Already in plan check? See how to respond to plan check comments.

See across disciplinesReview relationships that are difficult to catch sheet by sheet.
Trace every findingGo directly to the supporting drawing, specification, checklist, or code source.
Keep design controlYour team evaluates every finding and makes the final professional decision.

More coverage without another round of manual comparison

Architectural sets carry thousands of relationships. Groundbook AI gives project teams a systematic first pass across them.

01 · CONSISTENCY

Keep design intent aligned

Compare plans, schedules, details, elevations, and specifications for requirements that drift as the design develops.

02 · COORDINATION

Review consultant interfaces

Surface possible clashes and omissions where architectural, structural, MEP, civil, and fire-protection documents meet.

03 · DELIVERY

Reduce late surprises

Find questions before permit, bid, or construction—when the team still has time to resolve them cleanly.

A review built around how architects coordinate a set

Choose the documents and checks that match the milestone. Groundbook AI returns structured, source-linked findings for your team to verify.

Explore floor plan review and layout checks →

Architectural set consistency

Compare room, door, finish, wall, equipment, key-note, and detail information across related sheets and schedules.

Drawings against specifications

Look for mismatched materials, ratings, products, dimensions, and performance requirements between the set and project manual.

Cross-discipline coordination

Follow interfaces with structure, MEP, fire protection, civil, landscape, and interiors across the complete project set.

Checklist and code-source review

Apply your QA/QC, owner, permit, accessibility, or code checklist, and compare against the codes governments publish online. Licensed codes are used only where a license allows it.

Explain what changed from DD to CD—with sources

Align two issued PDF sets, organize added, removed, and revised information, and draft a concise change narrative with sheet references for the architect and engineers to verify before sharing with contractors.

Available to beta users upon request
  • Compare milestone setsTrace changes between SD, Design Development, Construction Documents, permit, addendum, and bulletin issues.
  • Draft the narrativeOrganize verified changes by discipline, sheet, location, and project implication.
  • Prepare the contractor handoffCall attention to coordination and constructability changes without making estimating claims.

Fit a broader check into the way your team already works

1

Upload the milestone set

Add drawings, specifications, consultant documents, and checklists for the review. You can also upload a code you’re licensed to use, where your license allows it. Use the design milestone guide to define the expected scope. Follow the architectural drawing review checklist to trace plans, sections, schedules, and details.

2

Select the checks

Choose cross-file coordination, drawing-to-spec, checklist, and code-source comparisons.

3

Review with the team

Open findings with their supporting evidence, verify them, and route the right items for action.

Professional judgment stays with your team

Groundbook AI accelerates the first pass and organizes possible issues. It does not stamp, seal, approve, or replace architectural or engineering review.

  • Evidence linked to each finding
  • Structured severity, discipline, impact, and action
  • Results typically ready in 20 minutes to 24 hours, depending on project size

What architecture teams ask

Can Groundbook AI review consultant drawings with the architectural set?

Yes. Upload architectural, structural, MEP, fire-protection, civil, landscape, interiors, and other project documents together so the review can follow relationships across disciplines.

Can we use our own QA/QC checklist?

Yes. Upload a firm, owner, permit, or project-specific checklist and include checklist conformance in the review scope.

Does Groundbook AI replace the architect’s review?

No. Groundbook AI organizes possible issues and their evidence for qualified review. The architect and responsible professionals retain all design and professional decisions.

Can Groundbook AI create a DD-to-CD change narrative?

Yes. DD-to-CD change narratives are available to beta users upon request, with source-linked changes for the architect and engineers to verify. Explore drawing comparison.

Give your next set a broader first pass

Try the current review workflow, or show us how your team prepares milestone change narratives.

Catch coordination errors before your set goes out

Trusted by hundreds of professionals