Find discipline conflicts
Surface openings, penetrations, clearances, grids, levels, and load-bearing elements that may not align across consultant sets.
Groundbook AI for structural engineers
Catch coordination gaps before they reach the field.
Review structural plans, details, schedules, specifications, and adjacent disciplines together. Groundbook AI surfaces possible inconsistencies and interface risks with source evidence your engineers can verify.
Evidence-backed findings for qualified engineering review.
Coordinate every interfaceCompare structure with architectural, MEP, civil, and fire-protection documents.
Follow the evidenceEach finding links to the relevant files, pages, and drawing locations.
Review on your termsSelect the checks and let qualified engineers accept, reject, or resolve results.
Structural QA/QC at project scale
Extend the first pass beyond a single calculation or sheet.
Groundbook AI follows how structural information repeats and connects across the complete document set.
Reconcile repeated information
Compare plans, framing diagrams, details, schedules, general notes, and specifications for possible contradictions.
Move questions upstream
Identify coordination questions before fabrication, procurement, or installation makes the answer more expensive.
What Groundbook AI checks
Connections between structural intent and the rest of the project.
Upload the milestone set once, choose the review scope, and receive structured findings with source references.
Structural set consistency
Compare grids, levels, member designations, sizes, openings, notes, schedules, and related details across structural sheets.
Architectural and MEP coordination
Look for possible conflicts involving shafts, stairs, walls, ceilings, equipment, ducts, piping, and structural framing.
Drawings against specifications
Compare material, strength, connection, testing, and execution requirements between structural drawings and specifications.
Firm and project checklists
Run structural QA/QC, owner, peer-review, permit, or constructability checklists across the uploaded set.
A simple review workflow
Review more relationships without changing authoring tools.
Upload project documents
Add structural drawings, specifications, architectural and MEP sets, checklists, and reference files.
Scope the review
Choose cross-discipline, internal consistency, specification, checklist, or uploaded code-source checks.
Verify the findings
Inspect the cited evidence, apply engineering judgment, and route confirmed issues into your workflow.
AI-assisted, engineer-led
The engineer of record remains in control.
Groundbook AI supports structural review by organizing possible issues and evidence. It does not perform delegated design, stamp documents, or replace required calculations and engineering judgment.
- Source-linked findings, not unsupported answers
- Structured by severity, discipline, impact, and action
- Any project size, type, location, or major language
Built for the whole project team
Continue across adjacent disciplines.
Questions, answered
What structural teams ask.
Does Groundbook AI perform structural calculations?
Groundbook AI focuses on construction-document coordination, consistency, checklist conformance, and comparison with uploaded references. It does not replace structural analysis, calculations, or the engineer of record.
Can it compare structural drawings with architectural and MEP sets?
Yes. Those cross-discipline relationships are central to the review, including possible conflicts involving framing, openings, penetrations, shafts, grids, levels, and equipment.
Can we include our firm’s QA/QC checklist?
Yes. Upload your checklist with the project documents and include checklist conformance in the review scope.
Find the coordination question before the field does.
Start an AI-assisted structural document review in about five minutes.