Find discipline conflicts
Surface openings, penetrations, clearances, grids, levels, and load-bearing elements that may not align across consultant sets.
Catch coordination gaps before they reach the field
Review structural plans, details, schedules, specifications, and adjacent disciplines together. Groundbook AI surfaces possible inconsistencies and interface risks with source evidence your engineers can verify.
Evidence-backed findings for qualified engineering review.
Groundbook AI for structural engineers is an AI plan review that cross-checks plans, sections, details, schedules, and general notes against the architectural and MEP sets, specifications, and building codes, including those governments publish online. It surfaces possible coordination gaps and inconsistencies with the exact sheet and location, so the engineer of record can verify them before fabrication or construction.
Coordinate every interfaceCompare structure with architectural, MEP, civil, and fire-protection documents.
Follow the evidenceEach finding links to the relevant files, pages, and drawing locations.
Review on your termsSelect the checks and let qualified engineers accept, reject, or resolve results.
Extend the first pass beyond a single calculation or sheet
Groundbook AI follows how structural information repeats and connects across the complete document set.
Reconcile repeated information
Compare plans, framing diagrams, details, schedules, general notes, and specifications for possible contradictions.
Move questions upstream
Identify coordination questions before fabrication, procurement, or installation makes the answer more expensive.
Connections between structural intent and the rest of the project
Upload the milestone set once, choose the review scope, and receive structured findings with source references.
Structural set consistency
Compare grids, levels, member designations, sizes, openings, notes, schedules, and related details across structural sheets.
Architectural and MEP coordination
Look for possible conflicts involving shafts, stairs, walls, ceilings, equipment, ducts, piping, and structural framing.
Drawings against specifications
Compare material, strength, connection, testing, and execution requirements between structural drawings and specifications.
Firm and project checklists
Run structural QA/QC, owner, peer-review, permit, or constructability checklists across the uploaded set.
Trace structural changes between issued sets
Align two PDF drawing sets, organize changes to grids, framing, openings, details, schedules, and notes, and draft a source-linked milestone narrative for the structural engineer to verify before contractor handoff.
Available to beta users upon request- Compare DD, CD, permit, and bulletin setsOrganize added, removed, and revised structural information by sheet and location.
- Surface coordination implicationsFlag changed openings, framing, levels, and interfaces that deserve multidisciplinary review.
- Keep engineering judgment in controlPrepare a draft narrative and evidence—not calculations or final conclusions.
Review more relationships without changing authoring tools
Upload project documents
Add structural drawings, specifications, architectural and MEP sets, checklists, and reference files.
Scope the review
Choose cross-discipline, internal consistency, specification, checklist, or building code checks.
Verify the findings
Inspect the cited evidence, apply engineering judgment, and route confirmed issues into your workflow.
The engineer of record remains in control
Groundbook AI supports structural review by organizing possible issues and evidence. It does not perform delegated design, stamp documents, or replace required calculations and engineering judgment.
- Source-linked findings, not unsupported answers
- Structured by severity, discipline, impact, and action
- Any project size, type, location, or major language
Continue across adjacent disciplines
What structural teams ask
Does Groundbook AI perform structural calculations?
Groundbook AI focuses on construction-document coordination, consistency, checklist conformance, and comparison with uploaded references. It does not replace structural analysis, calculations, or the engineer of record.
Can it compare structural drawings with architectural and MEP sets?
Yes. Those cross-discipline relationships are central to the review, including possible conflicts involving framing, openings, penetrations, shafts, grids, levels, and equipment.
Can we include our firm’s QA/QC checklist?
Yes. Upload your checklist with the project documents and include checklist conformance in the review scope.
Find the coordination question before the field does
Try the current workflow, or talk with us about source-linked milestone comparisons.