Trace each sign location into its sign type, message content, and mounting requirements, then compare room numbering, tactile and Braille content, and mounting height and location for the same door or wall before treating a placement schedule entry as coordinated with the current drawings.
Assemble the review package
Gather the floor plans with current room numbers, the sign placement schedule or legend, the door schedule, the life-safety plan for stair identification and exit tactile signs, and the issued interior signage specification. Review one floor or wing completely, since a room renumbering can affect the sign schedule without the drawings showing an obvious conflict.
WBDG publishes UFGS 10 14 00.20: Interior Signage as a public guide-specification reference (accessed September 23, 2026). Use your project’s issued specification and amendments for the actual comparison; the guide specification does not automatically govern your project. The checklist below is an original suggested review workflow, not a reproduction of the UFGS requirements.
Eight checks to run against the issued set
Use one record per location or system. The CSV contains the same eight prompts plus fields for source revisions, observed evidence, the review owner, the decision, and closure references.
| Check | Sources to compare | Question to resolve |
|---|---|---|
| Sign type assignment | Placement schedule + sign-type product clauses | Does every scheduled location resolve to a defined sign type (room identification, directional, panel, or modular system) rather than a generic "sign" note? |
| Room numbering and message content | Current floor plan room number + sign message schedule | Does the message content in the schedule match the room number and name currently shown on the floor plan, not an earlier numbering scheme? |
| Tactile letters and Braille | Room sign content + tactile and Braille clauses | Where a sign requires tactile letters and Braille, does the specified character format match the message content assigned to that sign? |
| Mounting height and location | Door or wall elevation + mounting-location clauses | Does the drawn or scheduled mounting height and side-of-door location match the specification for that sign type? |
| Exit and stair identification | Life-safety plan + exit tactile sign and stair signage clauses | Are exit door tactile signs and stair identification signs assigned to the locations the life-safety plan identifies, with content matching the current floor designation? |
| Building directory scope | Directory location and type + specified directory clauses | Where an illuminated or electronic directory is shown, does the specification’s power, data, or wayfinding requirement match what the drawings provide at that location? |
| Character proportions and contrast | Specified character height and finish + sign location | Do the specified character proportions and color contrast match the viewing distance and finish intended for that sign’s location? |
| Submittal scope | Specified message schedule submittal + placement schedule | Does the requested submittal include a complete message schedule covering every distinct sign type and room shown, not only a sample sign? |
Worked example: a sign schedule that outlived a room renumbering
Illustrative example: a floor plan is revised late in design to renumber a wing of offices, but the sign placement schedule still lists the previous room numbers for that wing’s standard room signs. The sign type, mounting height, and tactile lettering format are all correctly specified; only the message content is now wrong.
Compare the current floor plan’s room numbers against the sign schedule row by row for the affected wing, correct the message content, and check the door schedule and any room-number cross-references for the same unaddressed renumbering. Recheck stair and exit signage on the same floor before closing the item.
Avoid a false conflict
A correctly specified sign type and mounting height do not confirm the message content is current; a room renumbering or use change can leave the schedule’s text wrong even when the sign hardware and format are exactly right. Confirm the current room list before accepting a placement schedule as final.
When requirements disagree, follow the project’s document-control and clarification process. Do not assume that drawings always override specifications, or the reverse. Identify the exact sources and request an authorized decision.
Close the issue across the affected documents
Record the location or tag, drawing and specification references, issue dates, observed difference, and the decision needed. Assign an owner and keep the item open until the response identifies the governing requirement. Check the revised drawings and specification references together; a response email alone may leave the issued package inconsistent.
For the overall process, use the guide to drawing and specification conflicts. Mark an inapplicable checklist row with a reason, and distinguish a verified correction from a question that still needs design information.
Where Groundbook fits
Groundbook’s drawing and specification review helps investigate potential disagreements in the documents you supply. Include the relevant specification sections and drawing references, then verify the cited evidence with the responsible reviewers before acting on a finding.