Construction documents · Georgia

AI plan review in Georgia

Georgia separates mandatory construction codes from codes that depend on local adoption. Capture that distinction in the review instructions, especially for existing-building work where the chosen reference path affects what reviewers should compare.

Your codes, connected to your drawings

Bring your own code PDFs

Groundbook can review your drawings against the state and local code PDFs you upload. Add the adopted code books and amendments that apply to your project, then review potential issues with links to the supporting sources.

  1. Add your references

    Upload the applicable code PDFs alongside the drawing set. Include the edition, local amendments, and project requirements.

  2. Choose each file’s role

    Set code PDFs to Code and Use as reference. Mark the drawings you want reviewed as Check this file.

  3. Review the findings

    Follow the linked drawing and reference, check applicability, and have the responsible professional verify the issue.

How to use local code references
Groundbook project files with four California Title 24 code PDFs set to Code and Use as reference, and a drawing set marked Check this file.
California code PDFs shown as an example. Upload the references that apply to your project.Try with your code PDFs

State and local references

Code references for Georgia

Examples of references you can bring into Groundbook. Confirm the adopted edition, effective date, and project scope with the reviewing authority, then upload the applicable PDFs.

Code names link to official agency or publisher resources. Reviewed September 9, 2026. The reference set comes from the files you supply.

Georgia reference guide

Establish who reviews what

Distinguish applicability from enforcement

Georgia DCA explains that mandatory codes apply regardless of whether a local government enforces them. Permissive codes require local adoption; the absence of local enforcement is not a general exemption from mandatory standards.

Georgia DCA: mandatory and permissive codes

Use discipline-specific amendments

DCA publishes the current minimum-code list and Georgia amendment files by discipline. The list can contain different model-code years, so copy each applicable edition rather than assigning one year to the whole package.

Georgia DCA: current minimum codes

Sources reviewed September 9, 2026. Confirm current requirements and project applicability with the reviewing authority.

Prepare a useful review

What to bring for Georgia

Use this preparation list for Groundbook alongside the official permit checklist.

Mandatory-code matrix

Record the applicable code and Georgia amendments for each discipline. Include the reviewing department’s intake checklist.

Local permissive adoption

For rehabilitation or other optional-code paths, supply evidence of local adoption and any written determination of the review approach.

Consistent life-safety information

Compare the code analysis, occupancy, exit plans, rated assemblies, and MEP interfaces. Add State Fire Marshal references when that scope applies.

A current drawing register

Identify which files are being checked, which are references, and which revisions are superseded. Include reviewer comments and responses where they explain an unresolved decision.

Use the drawing-register template

Before you start

Georgia plan review FAQs

Does no local enforcement mean no Georgia code requirement?

No. DCA states that mandatory codes apply even without local enforcement. Check local adoption separately for permissive codes and establish who reviews the project’s actual scope.

Which documents should I supply for a Georgia AI plan review?

Supply the current drawing set and schedules, relevant specifications and reports, the applicable code and amendment PDFs, and the reviewing authority’s checklist. Identify the edition, project scope, and permit stage. Groundbook reviews the supplied evidence; do not assume every local requirement is already available.

Does Groundbook approve a permit or certify compliance?

No. Groundbook surfaces potential conflicts and omissions with links to source documents for professional verification. It does not issue permits, certify compliance, provide permit-expediting services, or replace the authority having jurisdiction.

Official source directory

Keep the reference trail

Browse all states and San Francisco

Review the set before you submit

Bring your drawings and the references that govern the project.

Product screenshot